Project Delivery FAQs How can State departments be sure that by engaging the CA-PMO, they are not bringing on a control agency insider?What is the likelihood that the CDT ITPOD will start imposing conditions of engaging the CA-PMO services for project approval?If a State department retains the CA-PMO services, do they still need to engage the Information Technology Project Oversight Division (ITPOD) from the California Department of Technology (CDT)?Will the CA-PMO resources be based on site at the client department 100% or will they come to the client department on an as-needed basis?If a State department is not satisfied with the resources assigned by the CA-PMO, what alternatives do they have?Will the CA-PMO provide non-technology related resources? For example: Business Analyst, etc.?To whom do the CA-PMO project resources report? Do they report to the client department or to the CA-PMO executive management?Can a department engage the CA-PMO for a specific, short-term resource? For example: a Project Scheduler is needed for a short-term or on a part-time basis?What staff classifications are deployed by the CA-PMO for engagement on a client department project? How are the classifications determined?What criteria are used to select a CA-PMO engagement model?Who makes the decision on the choice of CA-PMO engagement model; e.g. Full or Balanced Project Management Services vs. Consulting Services?What are the different ways that the CA-PMO can be engaged by a client department?Does the California Project Management Office (CA-PMO) have any control agency authority? Back to FAQs Our department About CDT Contact us regarding our website Resources and support compliance for our website Account Lead Directory Community of practice Artificial Intelligence community of practice Geographic Information Systems community of practice Digital Web Services Network community of practice Project Delivery community of practice State campaigns Register to Vote Save Our Water Flex Alert Website Accessibility Certification
How can State departments be sure that by engaging the CA-PMO, they are not bringing on a control agency insider?
What is the likelihood that the CDT ITPOD will start imposing conditions of engaging the CA-PMO services for project approval?
If a State department retains the CA-PMO services, do they still need to engage the Information Technology Project Oversight Division (ITPOD) from the California Department of Technology (CDT)?
Will the CA-PMO resources be based on site at the client department 100% or will they come to the client department on an as-needed basis?
If a State department is not satisfied with the resources assigned by the CA-PMO, what alternatives do they have?
To whom do the CA-PMO project resources report? Do they report to the client department or to the CA-PMO executive management?
Can a department engage the CA-PMO for a specific, short-term resource? For example: a Project Scheduler is needed for a short-term or on a part-time basis?
What staff classifications are deployed by the CA-PMO for engagement on a client department project? How are the classifications determined?
Who makes the decision on the choice of CA-PMO engagement model; e.g. Full or Balanced Project Management Services vs. Consulting Services?
